"There is no amount of pretty in the world that can cover a venomous heart."

Ah, the irony! Rhonda Huntress said that, and she also said:

http://forums-archive.secondlife.com/327/85/252954/3653.html (The quote in Rio's post, sixth post down.)

http://forums-archive.secondlife.com/327/85/252954/3828.html (Top post.)

Tuesday, 26 April 2011


Poor old hyprocritical hapless Nina has just posed to suggest that I might be allowed back to gV on a "conditional" basis. How ridiculous is that? If I go back it is on the basis that the same "conditions" apply to me as EVERY OTHER MEMBER. Which means, if the behaviour of the members since (and before) I was banned is any guideline, I can do just about anything I like, subject to the unwritten rule about making Nina and her alts feel harassed, bullied and intimidated - although that's fine for everyone else.

I have already stated that the way forward for Nina (assuming she really wants the "no holds barred" forum that she keeps saying she does) is to divide the forum into three:

1. A Governance node, where only Modules could post, plus and possibly - three? - members elected to represent the community, who could be easily replaced if they got out of line.

2. A NSFW node, where anything legal goes (even Wasted) and where people should not participate if they don't want to feel "harassed, bulled or intimidated".

3. A SFW node, so Lias could feel safe while at work, supposedly with no porn, nor drama, with threads that devolve being moved to the NSFW node and notices of warnings/infractions issued to anyone who interferes in civilised discussions there.

The Community Standards would need clarifying, but they do already, to resolve the ambiguity of the written unacceptability of "harassment and bullying" (however they might vindictively be defined) THROUGHOUT the forum, with the subsequent acknowledgement by Nina that "anything goes" in the current NSFW nodes.

No comments:

Post a Comment